When pragmatism is invited into architecture: a meeting placed under the sign of the obvious
Main Article Content
Abstract
Taking the theme of the dossier literally, this article tells the story of a particular encounter between architecture and philosophy. The scene is set in New York in 2000, when Joan Ockman took the initiative of introducing the American philosophical tradition of Pragmatism into the field of architecture. She put in place a series of ambitious arrangements to bring about this unprecedented and risky encounter: a Reader bringing together articles by architects and pragmatist philosophers on supposedly common themes, a transdisciplinary assembly meeting in panels or in dialogue on the occasion of a workshop at Columbia University and a conference at MoMA, and, finally, the publication of some of these contributions. The relative failure of this series of events invites us to question the conditions for the success of such an encounter. To do this, the article first sets out to unfold the mechanisms that were put in place, before looking at the arguments that they made possible. The narrative itself borrows from pragmatist methods and criteria: on the one hand, the artificiality of the encounter is seen as an opportunity; on the other, its success must be measured in the light of its consequences. Finally, pragmatist criteria for judging a good encounter between architecture and philosophy are sketched out: this scene and the discussions that take place on it lead us to consider the adoption of philosophical thought by architecture as necessarily a matter of 'creative betrayal'.
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
References
ALLEN, S. 2012. «The future that is now: architectural education in North America, 1990-2012», dans J. Ockman (sous la dir. de), Architecture School: Three Centuries of Educating Architects in North America, Cambridge Massachusetts, MIT Press, p.203-229.
BAIRD, G. 2004. «“Criticality” and its discontents», Harvard Design Magazine, n°21, p.16-21.
BLAKE, C.N. 1995. «The perils of personality: Lewis Mumford and politics after liberalism», dans R. Hollinger; D.J. Depew (sous la dir. de), Pragmatism: from Progressivism to Postmodernism, Westport Connecticut, Praeger, p.88-106.
BLAKE, C.N. 2000. «Afterword: what’s pragmatism got to do with it?», dans J. Ockman (sous la dir. de), The Pragmatist Imagination. Thinking about «Things in the Making», New York, Princeton Architectural Press, p.266-271.
BROTT, S. 2010. «Deleuze and “The Intercessors”», Log, n° 18, p.135-151.
CUSSET, F. 2005. French Theory: Foucault, Derrida, Deleuze & Cie et les mutations de la vie intellectuelle aux États-Unis, Paris, La Découverte.
DAHMS, H.-J.; KRAUSSE, J. (sous la dir. de) 2001. «Neuer Pragmatismus in der Architektur», ARCH+, n° 156.
DELEUZE, G. 2003. «Lettre à un critique sévère», dans Pourparlers 1972-1990, Paris, Éditions de Minuit.
DICKSTEIN, M. 1998. The Revival of Pragmatism: New Essays on Social Thought, Law, and Culture, Durham, Duke University Press.
FERNÁNDEZ-GALIANO, L. (sous la dir. de) 2001. «Pragmatismo y Paisaje / Pragmatism and Landscape», AV Monographs, numéro spécial, n° 91.
JAMES, W. (1907) 2007. Le pragmatisme: un nouveau nom pour d’anciennes manières de penser, Paris, Flammarion.
MERKEL, J. 2001. «Talking about pragmatism», Oculus – the New York Chapter of the AIA, vol. 63, n° 6.
NOBEL, p.2001. «What pragmatism ain’t», Metropolis Magazine (juillet), Consultable: http://www.uky.edu/~eushe2/Pajares/jamesPragmatismAint.html [disponible le 22 avril 2014].
OCKMAN, J. 1997. «The road not taken: Alexander Dorner’s way beyond art», dans R.E. Somol (sous la dir. de), Autonomy and Ideology: Positioning an Avant-Garde in America, New York, Monicelli Press.
OCKMAN, J.; RILEY, T. 2000. Things in the Making: Contemporary Architecture and the Pragmatist Imagination, [cassette audio standard de 90 minutes], Sound Recordings of Museum-Related Events, 2001. 26a-27d, Museum of Modern Art – Museum Archives, New York.
OCKMAN, J. (sous la dir. de) 2000a. The Pragmatist Imagination. Thinking about «Things in the Making», New York, Princeton Architectural Press.
OCKMAN, J. (sous la dir. de) 2000b. The Pragmatist Imagination. Reader [brochure reliée], The Temple Hoyne Buell Center for American Architecture Records, Avery Architectural & Fine Arts Library – Columbia University, New York.
OCKMAN, J. 2000c. Letter to the Moderators [document dactylographié], The Temple Hoyne Buell Center for American Architecture Records, Avery Architectural & Fine Arts Library – Columbia University, New York.
OCKMAN, J. 2001. «What’s new about the “new” pragmatism and what does it have to do with architecture?», A+U,
n°9, p.26-28.
OCKMAN, J. 2013. Interviewée par Pauline Lefebvre, New York, 21 février 2013.
RAJCHMAN, J. 1998. «A new pragmatism?», dans C. Davidson (sous la dir. de), ANYhow, Cambridge Massachusetts, MIT Press.
RAJCHMAN, J.; WEST, C. 1985. Post-Analytic Philosophy, New York, Columbia University Press.
RORTY, R. 2001. «On the necessity of philosophy for the artist», ARCH+, n°156, p.44-47.
SPEAKS, M., 2000. «Which Way Avant-Garde ?», Assemblage, n°41, p.78
SPEAKS, M. 2002. «Design Intelligence and the New Economy», Architectural Record, n° 190, p.72–75.
STENGERS, I. 1997. Cosmopolitiques, VII: pour en finir avec la tolérance, Paris, La Découverte.
SYKES, K. 2010. Constructing a New Agenda: Architectural Theory 1993-2009, New York, Princeton Architectural Press.
WEST, C. 1989. The American Evasion of Philosophy: A Genealogy of Pragmatism, Madison Wisconsin, University of Wisconsin Press.
WEST, C. 1993. «Race and architecture», dans Keeping Faith: Philosophy and Race in America, New York, Routledge.
WEST, C. 1999. The Cornel West Reader, New York, Basic Civitas Books.
WEST, C.; KOOLHAAS R. 2001. «Critical mass: urban philosophies», AV Monographs, n° 91, p.15-33.